VENEZUELA: EL ESPEJO

Por Romalh e iyamiami

 

Hace un tiempo atras comentaba en nuestro blog  que Cuba tiene la suerte de poseer un espejo, una bola de cristal en un pais hermano: VENEZUELA,  historicamente cien anos luz por delante respecto a los cubanos en cuanto a rebeldia popular se refiere.

Mirar lo que sucede en Venezuela es saber con certeza lo que nos sucedera en el SUPUESTO de que,  en algun futuro no previsible,  la oposicion cubana (asumiendo con el termino solo al TRIGO PURO y no a los apendices secretos de la propia inteligencia castrista, voluntarios unos y colaboradores involuntarios otros, pero igualmente inutiles para Cuba), logre tener una capacidad de convocatoria parecida a la de la oposicion venezolana,  cosa que,  hasta ahora,  no parece vislumbrarse en el terreno de nuestra realidad, plagada de perdida absoluta de valores y civismo,  ignorancia y miopia politica, oportunismo, desidia y desinformacion supina, todo cultivado por una satrapia durante medio siglo.

Asi pues, lo primero es lo primero: aprender de Venezuela, aprender de las sistematicas traiciones de los organismos internacionales, entender que pasa, acumular alianzas verdaderas y utiles y estar listos para cuando llegue, si llega algun dia, el momento de Cuba.  Solo podremos estar listos asumiendo objetivamente nuestras posibilidades y posicion en “la realidad REAL” y no basandonos en los espejismos y demagogias de turno.

Si bien podemos celebrar a la administracion de Donald Trump al menos por su INTENCION y sus pasos dados para ser aliada verdadera de la oposicion al castrismo, del exilio cubano y del pueblo de Cuba y no de su pandilla gobernando,  debemos tratar de ver y entender por que NI AUN EN VENEZUELA SE VE SU MANO SOLIDARIA; demasiadas guerras en el mundo para meterse en una mas y desestabilizar definitivamente una region que ya se encuentra desde hace rato EN EQUILIBRIO MILAGROSO.

“America first”no es precisamente “Gloria al bravo pueblo”, ni “Cuba primero, Cuba despues y Cuba siempre”. Cuba es en el mundo en que vivimos apenas un punto dentro de una pagina para quien no sea cubano. Estamos tan solos como los venezolanos para intentar ser duenos de nuestro destino como pais. El mundo, desde siempre,  no transcurre en terminos de buenos y malos, sino de intereses y alianzas basadas en los mismos.

Trump en este momento esta enfocado totalmente en la reunion europea.  Asistimos a UN NUEVO REPARTO GEOPOLITICO DEL MUNDO entre los “TRES GRANDES” y sucedera solo lo que ellos decidan,  una vez obtenida UNA REPARTICION DEL CAKE MUNDIAL que resulte satisfactoria unicamente para sus intereses nacionales, sin descartar en la reparticion al empuje y presencia de intereses monetarios supranacionales a traves de politicos y gobiernos a su servicio, para el objetivo de lograr un gobierno mundial QUIZAS MEJOR DISFRAZADO que el actual,  que ha quedado al descubierto durante las pasadas elecciones norteamericanas.

Puede ser, quien sabe, que algun rejuego geopolitico favorezca a los cubanos y perjudique a Siria,  favorezca a Colombia pero sacrifique a Ucrania…el rearreglo y el cambalache estan ocurriendo, las fichas estan en juego y somos nosotros. En la libertad de Cuba y de todos,  las alianzas son importantes y, es verdad, la navegadita a la libertad cubana tiene que darla el cubano en el bote cubano, pero los vientos y las olas internacionales hacen lo suyo y sin viento ni olas o con ellos en contra la navegadita resulta imposible, mas aun para un bote anclado en la misma piedra totalitaria por mas de medio siglo. Recuerdan la conocida pelicula “QUEMADA”, tantas veces traida a estas paginas para educar? Eso es la politica real. El resto sera MUSICA DE FONDO Y CIRCO.

En Venezuela, ahora mismo y a pesar de las guarimbas intransigentes que mayoritariamente reflejan el sentir y sabiduria popular, convencida de que cualquier camino sin la salida del regimen es inutil, ese gato por liebre esta en curso, denunciado por algunos, invisible para otros,  pero decidiendo el futuro para todos los venezolanos en los proximos dias, el futuro de los que denuncian el fraude constituyente y las consignas vacias del castrochavismo, el de los que lo avalan y el de los que ni saben de que estamos hablando. Detras de todo el escenario de muerte y violencia, los intereses supranacionales mueven sus fichas dentro y fuera. Y esperan y deciden.

En cuanto a los metodos de disidencia pacifica, tan cacareados y proclamados como panacea y camino,  historicamente solo han dado resultados despues de que las grandes potencias acordaran LA DESCOLONIZACION DEL MUNDO tras la segunda guerra mundial, ni siquiera el mismisimo Ghandi triunfo antes de ese momento… Y NO FUE POR CASUALIDAD. Tienen un valor propio y necesario, pero no deciden.

La verdad sobre la naturaleza de la libertad y la unica forma de conquistarla, sin por ello renunciar a otras formas de oposicion,  fue expuesta hace mucho tiempo por nuestro MARTI y en lenguaje mas asequible aun por el TITAN DE BRONCE: LA LIBERTAD NO SE MENDIGA, SE CONQUISTA CON EL FILO DEL MACHETE.  Pero el contexto en que todo sucede no puede ser ignorado sin correr el  riesgo de hacer irremediables sacrificios en vano.

Por el camino que vamos, mirandonos en el espejo de Venezuela y viendo lo que alli sucede como en una bola de cristal, en Cuba sin guarimbas habra elecciones cuando el regimen lo decida y quiza las diversas propuestas disidentes sean incluidas, pero a condicion…unicamente a condicion…solo a condicion… de que sean inofensivas y controlables para el castrismo y para los intereses supranacionales que mueven las fichas en el mundo.

Asi es que esperemos lo mejor: que el espiritu de la politica de Trump a la isla se vea complementado por un ajedrez geopolitico favorable, pero preparemonos para lo peor: una continuacion de lo que ya tuvimos desde 1959 hasta la llegada de Trump a la casa blanca: Mas gato por liebre. Miremonos en Venezuela. Aprendamos de una vez.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anuncios
  1. iyamiami
  2. Romalh
    4 septiembre, 2017 en 5:54 AM




    Joe Rogan & Alex Jones on Pizzagate:
    Anthony Weiner, Hillary Clinton, John Podesta

  3. Romalh
    4 septiembre, 2017 en 5:49 AM




  4. Romalh
    4 septiembre, 2017 en 5:43 AM

    September 4, 2017
    Robert Mueller and the Sorcerer’s Apprentice
    By John M. Ellis
    Did President Trump have a right to be annoyed with Jeff Sessions for recusing himself? A plausible case can be made that Sessions didn’t have to do it, but then there’s an equally plausible case that he did. The real grounds for criticizing Sessions lie elsewhere: once he decided that he would need to recuse himself, Sessions had a duty to make sure that a replacement was on hand who was up to the task that Sessions had sidestepped. That he did not do. Rod Rosenstein has made one grievous mistake after another, with no end in sight.

    Rosenstein’s most important error was the complete incoherence of his statement of the scope of the investigation in his order of May 17 appointing Robert Mueller as Special Counsel: “…any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump.” Here he specified no particular actor (there are scores that this might refer to) nor particular actions, times or places, nor even crimes, because “links” and “coordination” are not in themselves criminal.

    Think about what Special Counsel was being asked to do. Absent any specific allegations, he would need to do something akin to proving a negative. Proving that a specific event actually happened is possible because the details of that event tell us where to look, but proving that something never happened is impossible because it could have happened at any time or place and by action of any person. We could never exhaust all the possibilities. Similarly, for Special Counsel to reach the conclusion that no coordination ever took place is a logical impossibility: it would require that he retroactively monitor every moment of the life of every person involved in the Trump campaign, and that he seize every conceivable record of all such people. If he only asked for phone records, he would miss evidence in emails, but if he also asked for emails, he would miss evidence in written correspondence. And if he asked only for all of these, he would miss what diaries can tell him. And then there are text messages… But even all of this would not be enough: he would need to look into what other people’s records might tell him about each person’s activities. (But which other people? How many?) Mueller would have to do this for every single one of Trump’s campaign staff.

    But since he can’t cite any criminal act, he has no legal grounds to get any of this evidence. The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 28, Section 600, provides that Special Counsel shall have no special powers but only those of any other U.S. Attorney, and that he must follow all rules and regulations of the Justice Department. Like every other U.S. Attorney, he’d have to show why he needs records, and having no alleged crime to base his request on, he can’t.

    To get anything at all he’d have to proceed unethically and in violation of the law. There is a now well-known Special Counsel tactic: focus on a person who has been close to the president, seize all his records, then look for any infraction whatsoever that will give you the chance to squeeze him by offering immunity in exchange for something that will damage the president. That seems to be what Mueller is doing: he has managed to persuade a gullible judge that, contrary to the explicit provisions of Section 600, the mystique of a Special Counsel’s investigation gives him the power to seize large quantities of evidence from Paul Manafort without evidence of a crime. Let’s be clear about this: it amounts to trying to find out whether at some moment or other on some day or other and in some place or other Manafort just might have committed some crime or other. The U.S. Constitution protects us all from unreasonable searches and seizures, and this is the ultimate unreasonable search. Seeing this, Rosenstein ought to have intervened to stop this ugly behavior. But how can he? The charge he gave Mueller virtually leaves him no alternative.
    Under the currently operative rules, a Special Counsel is not completely independent: he has a supervisor, the acting attorney general. But Rosenstein either can’t or won’t supervise Mueller. Many have pointed out that Mueller’s appointees include large numbers of prominent donors to the Clinton campaign, with none on the other side. Rosenstein should long since have told Mueller to stop doing this, both because it’s unfair and because it has undermined public confidence in his investigation. More important still, his appointees have the most flagrant conflicts of interest. Take simply one case, that of Jeannie Rhee: Rhee worked for the Clinton Foundation, but she was also Hillary Clinton’s personal lawyer in the matter of her emails. Mueller saw no problem in hiring her as one of his senior staff. Yet the hacking of DNC emails allegedly by the Russians is at the very center of Muller’s investigation, and Rhee has direct prior partisan involvement precisely there, where it matters most. She doesn’t just have a conflict — she has the worst possible conflict of interest. Rosenstein should have told Mueller to get rid of Rhee immediately, and to make sure that none of his staff are conflicted. But he does nothing

    It’s fair to ask at this point: what does this episode tell us about Mueller’s fitness for the position to which he has been appointed? If he didn’t notice this and other similar conflicts, he is incompetent. But if he knew about them and still wanted such people on his team, then he must be a ruthless partisan, and a man completely lacking in integrity. An investigation of this kind looks above all for corruption in government. Haven’t we already found it in these people being hired by this Special Counsel?

    Many other circumstances surrounding the Mueller appointment throw doubt on Rosenstein’s ability to do the job Sessions left to him. In his June 8 testimony James Comey said that he leaked a memo about his conversation with President Trump in order to whip up public pressure for the appointment of a Special Counsel. In essence, he freely admitted that he was trying to stampede Rosenstein into a hasty, ill-considered action — and he succeeded. Rosenstein allowed himself to be manipulated, and the utter incoherence of his order is the measure of how ill-considered his action was. Worse still, Comey publicly humiliated Rosenstein by explaining just how he had played him: now everyone knew that an investigation of extraordinary national importance had been initiated by sleazy and devious behavior on Comey’s part. The onus was now on Rosenstein to repair the damage done by his failure to understand how he was manipulated. He did nothing.

    Yet another problem created by Rosenstein’s panicked action was his choice of Mueller to head the investigation. Since Comey’s firing was an important part of the whole affair, Mueller’s notoriously close personal and professional relationship with Comey should have ruled him out. But by the time that Comey (in his June 8 testimony) revealed the full depth of his antagonism to the President, that point had become much stronger. Mueller’s credibility had by then completely evaporated. But Rosenstein still did nothing.

    Now at last it has come to light that the hacking and dissemination of the DNC emails was done not by the Russians (as Obama’s intelligence chiefs falsely assured us with such smug confidence) but by a DNC insider. This new revelation removes the only factual basis that has ever existed for the Mueller investigation. And still, Rosenstein does nothing.

    When he recused himself, Attorney General Sessions had a duty to ensure that the person who would stand in for him was up to the job. Clearly, Rosenstein was not. He has seemed like the sorcerer’s apprentice, who couldn’t resist exercising his master’s powers, but didn’t really understand what he was setting in motion. As things have got more and more out of control, he has seemed powerless to stop them. It’s time for the boss to return and boot the apprentice out of his study.

  5. raulizquierdo2009
  6. raulizquierdo2009
    3 septiembre, 2017 en 10:16 AM

    Ay los partidos ! Y los jovenes muertos ?

  7. iyamiami
    3 septiembre, 2017 en 9:34 AM

    Cuando en su momento anticipamos que Google haria para el castrismo lo que hizo en china para su dictadura, un google “especial”, fuimos insultados por los comemierdas de siempre, porque mentiamos y lo de google era una muestra de que se abria una gran brecha, todo “gracias” a la politica de acercamiento y apaciguamiento de obama. Ahi tienen…comemierdas.
    https://www.cubanet.org/noticias/google-rompio-su-promesa-los-cubanos-dice-wall-street-journal/

  8. Romalh
    2 septiembre, 2017 en 6:06 PM

    LA MATANZA DE KATYN – Pruebas oficiales y documental.

    Published on Apr 23, 2017
    Tuvieron que pasar 70 años para que Rusia reconociera oficialmente que fueron los dirigentes soviéticos, y específicamente Iósif Stalin, quienes ordenaron el fusilamiento de miles de polacos en el bosque de Katyn. Esta matanza fue perpetrada en la primavera de 1940 después de que, de acuerdo con el tratado Ribbentrop-Mólotov, la Unión Soviética ocupara Polonia oriental. Los prisioneros que los soviéticos tomaron en 1939 -la mayoría oficiales- fueron ejecutados por los oficiales del NKVD, la policía secreta. La URSS mantuvo durante décadas que los responsables habían sido los nazis

    “Los materiales publicados, que durante muchos años estuvieron guardados en archivos secretos, muestran no solo la magnitud de esa terrible tragedia, sino también que el crimen de Katyn fue perpetrado por orden directa de Stalin y otros dirigentes soviéticos”, se señala en la declaración parlamentaria.

    Las sepulturas de los polacos fueron encontradas por las tropas alemanas después de que estas conquistaran Smolensk. A 14 kilómetros al oeste, en el bosque de Katyn, los nazis descubrieron los restos de más de 4.000 polacos, en su mayoría oficiales. Pero esta era una pequeña parte de los más de 20.000 militares apresados en Polonia y traídos a territorio soviético. El resto fue ejecutado en Kiev, Járkov, Jersón (Ucrania), Minsk (Bielorrusia) y en la cárcel de Kalinin (hoy Tver).

    La propaganda soviética afirmó, después de la guerra, que habían sido los nazis los que habían fusilado a los polacos, versión que mantuvo su carácter de irrefutable hasta la desintegración de la URSS. Pero los archivos abiertos después de la caída del comunismo en Rusia mostraban que la matanza la había comenzado a preparar el NKVD en febrero de 1940 en el marco de una operación que tenía como fin eliminar a los prisioneros polacos.

    El público pudo tener acceso a esta verdad solo a partir de abril de 2010, cuando a iniciativa del presidente Dmitri Medvédev algunas copias electrónicas de documentos secretos sobre Katyn fueron colgadas en Internet.
    =================================
    – CUANTOS ANOS ESTUVO ESTA HISTORIA FALSEADA?

    – CUANTOS MAS FALTARAN PARA QUE OTROS FALSEAMIENTOS HISTORICOS SEAN DE IGUAL MANERA PUBLICAMENTE RECONOCIDOS?

  9. Romalh
    2 septiembre, 2017 en 5:57 PM

  10. Romalh
    2 septiembre, 2017 en 2:23 PM

    COMO SIEMPRE, NO SE TRATA DE QUE LO CREA SINO QUE LO LEA

    Una vision alternativa de la historia que por su erudiccion merece ser evaluada, recuerde que toda obra tiene AUTOR E INTENCION que no podemos certificar, asi pues use su cerebro y mire su entorno para comparar. AL MENOS ESTA OBRA ESTA FIRMADA, a diferencia de LOS PROTOCOLOS que no puede certificarse su autoria.
    ——————————————————–

    LEO FERRARO

    EL ULTIMO PROTOCOLO

    http://www.catolicosalerta.com.ar/libros/ultimo-protocolo.pdf

    Como siempre recomiendo bajelo a su computadora y lealo en paz OFF LINE.

    NUNCA SE SABE CUANTO TIEMPO SOBREVIVIRAN ON LINE ON LINE
    OBRAS DE REVISIONISMO HISTORICO DE ESTE CORTE.

  11. Romalh
    2 septiembre, 2017 en 11:15 AM

    A Supervolcano Waking Up In The USA -6/8/2017



  12. iyamiami
    2 septiembre, 2017 en 7:14 AM

  13. Romalh
    2 septiembre, 2017 en 6:46 AM




  14. Romalh
    2 septiembre, 2017 en 6:24 AM

    Bienvenido a nuestro mundo feliz – Minidocumental

  15. Romalh
    2 septiembre, 2017 en 6:07 AM

  16. iyamiami
    1 septiembre, 2017 en 11:20 PM

  17. iyamiami
    1 septiembre, 2017 en 10:59 PM

    Judge Rules FBI Must Share Details of Hillary Email Probe
    https://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/federal-judge-court-email-probe/2017/08/31/id/811006/

  18. iyamiami
    1 septiembre, 2017 en 10:31 PM

  19. raulizquierdo2009
    1 septiembre, 2017 en 10:57 AM
  20. Romalh
    1 septiembre, 2017 en 7:49 AM

    Trump y el apoyo de Pakistán a los yihadistas
    por Thierry Meyssan

    En su serie de análisis sobre la política de Donald Trump en el Medio Oriente, Thierry Meyssan muestra que, contrariamente a la opinión generalizada, el presidente de Estados Unidos no ha cambiado su estrategia. Rompiendo con sus predecesores, Trump ha tratado de cortar el apoyo de Pakistán a los yihadistas en Afganistán, como ya eliminó el respaldo de Arabia Saudita a los yihadistas en el Levante. El autor explica de paso que, aunque algunos electores de Trump dan muestras de inquietud al verlo desplegar más tropas en Afganistán, la lógica indica que deberían aprobar esa decisión.

    RED VOLTAIRE | DAMASCO (SIRIA) | 29 DE AGOSTO DE 2017
    http://www.voltairenet.org/article197616.html

  21. Romalh
    1 septiembre, 2017 en 7:41 AM

    Gorka: China Is ‘Executing Economic Warfare Against Us Right Now’
    http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2017/08/31/gorka-china-executing-economic-warfare-us-right-now/

  22. Romalh
    1 septiembre, 2017 en 7:38 AM

    The Democrats, Media and their Antifa Pit Bulls Are the Real Threat to America
    Aug 31, 2017
    https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2017/08/31/the-democrats-media-and-their-antifa-pitbulls-are-the-real-threat-to-america/

  23. Romalh
    1 septiembre, 2017 en 7:02 AM

    Alfredo Jalife: Situación que guarda al mundo en 2017

  24. Romalh
    1 septiembre, 2017 en 6:47 AM


    Published on 1 Jun 2017

    Club Bilderberg, 1953. Élites globalistas. Asistentes de este año. Españoles en Bilderberg (Ana Botín, Juan Luis Cebrián). Albert Rivera. Análisis de contenidos: tablero geopolítico mundial. Rol del Club a nivel mundial. Breve contexto histórico del Club Bilderbeg. Influencia del Club en la política mundial. Influencia del Club en España.
    ===========================
    ===========================
    Reunion del Club Bilderberg 2017

    ———————————————–
    Este segundo video tiene muchas impresiciones e inconsistencias en analisis pero da un buen recorrido por algunas areas de interes, VEALO CRITICAMENTE.

  25. Romalh
    1 septiembre, 2017 en 6:29 AM

    September 1, 2017
    Saving the Country from Its Own Government
    By Scott S. Powell

    Make no mistake. Removing statues and monuments related to the Confederacy, which is driven by the left, is not about redressing the legacy of slavery and racism, but rather it’s to advance the agenda to takedown the United States. There is, after all, enormous leverage for the left in transforming historic monuments of America’s past into symbols of racism and oppression. It’s like giving a new set of crowbars and sledgehammers to America’s internal enemies to help them further pull apart the unity of the American people, divide the electorate, and bludgeon their political opponents and particularly the present populist president, Donald Trump — to arouse yet more hatred and animosity toward him.

    This demolition campaign needs to be understood not only in the context of past and present politics, but also in context of the philosophy of those leading the agenda, the 50-year continuum of secular progressive accomplishments that preceded this, and most importantly why this stage may be the lynchpin in taking the country down.

    Philosophically, the left’s secular progressivism has always been rooted in Marxism and its neoMarxist offspring that are predominantly focused on socialist redistribution, environmentalism and race, class and gender warfare. This not only puts them at war with capitalism and free markets, but also with traditional and family values, patriotic symbols, liberties and national sovereignty that are enshrined in and protected by the Constitution — the legal basis of America’s democratic republic.

    Historically, back in the mid-1960s the U.S. welfare system and particularly Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) was transformed by radical activist lawyers and community legal aid interest groups, filing hundreds of lawsuits, who succeeded in establishing a federal constitutional right to a minimum adequate income based on the number of children in the single-parent household. The unintended but predictable consequences began showing up fairly quickly in terms of fewer marriages and absentee fathers, as well as negative psychological consequences of robbing people of the dignity of work. Urban black communities became transformed into a new plantation system of patronage by the Democratic Party.

    The dissolution of the family was broadened further through the 1970s sexual revolution and the explosion of divorce rates that followed, and within two generations four out of ten white children were being born out of wedlock. The mainstreaming of alternative LGBT relationships and legitimization of gay marriage further polarized the social fabric of the U.S., undermining the special place and central importance of traditional marriage and childbearing. The transgender agenda has been moving apace rapidly with a scope that ranges from encouraging children to question and even experiment with their sexual identities to transforming the armed services from their main purpose of fighting and winning wars. The conservation and environmental movement that is way more than 50 years old, has become so politically transformed by the left with dogma on global warming and climate change that it not only threatens to rearrange the economy with more government regulation and control, but it also seeks to deny skeptics and dissenters their First Amendment rights, prompting former attorney general Loretta Lynch to consider criminal charges and jail time for climate change dissenters.

    This legacy combined with the last decade’s significant growth in food stamp entitlements, a 700% increase in government-backed student loan indebtedness, and the doubling of federal government debt to nearly $20 trillion — all taking place in just two terms of Barack Obama’s administration — has caused many on the left to feel the conditions for collapse and final transformation of the U.S. are at hand.

    The reason that toppling and removing statues and monuments is a lynchpin in taking down America is simple: it serves to sever the present from the past and undermine the value and meaning of the sacrifice of our forebears. Early Americans’ failings in moral judgment regarding slavery were very real. But the nation paid a huge price for redemption from the sin of slavery by the shedding of the blood of some 800,000 Americans, who were killed in the Civil War — the largest loss of American life of any war in our history.

    The Civil War is remembered by most people as the seminal event that abolished slavery. But the Constitution was equally important, providing the legal mechanism for ending slavery, just as it provided the legal means to continue the process of advancing minority civil rights. In contrast to countries like Japan and Germany, which both made concerted efforts to expunge and cover up their egregious sins of imperialism and racial supremacy that led to World War II, America has faced its past mistakes without denial.

    The removal of Confederate monuments and statues not only belittles and diminishes the lives that were sacrificed on both sides, but it also serves to expunge from the American memory the growth and learning that came out of these moral failings. A people who fail to learn from their past — with all its struggle and sacrifice — are generally not equipped to think about where they are going. When you sever people’s consciousness of their past, they’re more likely to become sheep who can be led to their own slaughter.

    Indeed Americans are some of the most self-critical people in the world, which has shaped the nation in terms of its citizens learning from the nation’s failings. Facing failure with honesty is not a source of shame. Rather it is part of something we call, “American exceptionalism.”

    Looking back on my public school education in the 1960s, I remember that most students were required to read George Orwell’s classics Animal Farm and 1984 by their junior year in high school. At that time, there was a heightened concern about the phenomena of totalitarianism as the nation came to terms with shocking revelations from scholarly works on Nazism and also with the equally shocking expansion of brutal communist rule in new Soviet satellite states in Eastern Europe. Reading Orwell, it was thought, would help students gain perspective and critical faculties so as to understand socialist totalitarianism and its institutionalization of falsehood and propaganda designed to destroy people’s grasp on reality as well as to understand the dynamics of group think and collectivism, which are anathema to critical and independent thinking — the basis of a free society in America.

    I remember most of my classmates found Orwell’s narratives entertaining, but preposterous — especially as in a section in 1984, which read, “Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, and every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.”

    We thought then it could never happen in America.

    Fast-forward 50 years and we see that it has happened… in corruption and the concealing of corruption by the media and ruling elite like never before.

    A trip down recent memory lane requires confronting the lies and cover-ups of the “Fast and Furious” arms sale operations to Mexican drug dealers, the wholesale denial by the IRS of conservative groups’ first amendment rights, the terrorists attack in Benghazi that killed four Americans including Ambassador Chris Stevens, and the national security breaches by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton resulting from her email communication over a private and unsecure computer server, that was itself put in place to mask her conflicts of interests involving pay-for-play fundraising for the Clinton Foundation and her simultaneous duties of being Secretary of State. A level of corruption that is breathtaking.

    Then there was the unprecedented deficit spending that doubled the national debt to a staggeringly dangerous level in the Obama years without so much as a peep of warning out of the Federal Reserve.

    The establishment media has been dominated by liberals since the Vietnam War, but it has now almost completely gone over to the dark Orwellian side — showing no compunction at all about falsifying the record by omission, distortion, and even trying to stop history, “in an endless present in which the Party is always right.”

    The concepts of “newspeak” and “doublethink” in Orwell’s 1984 are quite fully manifest in what we experience now as political correctness. Newspeak is the distorted reality accomplished by manipulating the meaning of language and words, while double think is the conditioned mental attitude to ignore reality and common sense and substitute and embrace a distorted or false narrative to the exclusion of other views. As Orwell notes, “the whole aim of Newspeak and Doublethink is to narrow the range of thought.” This is the goal of political correctness, and it explains why its adherents tend to be so intolerant — even convinced that people with opposing views be arrested.

    One measure of the establishment’s venality is in their denial of unresolved issues and problems that violate core principles of the Constitution and threaten the nation’s economic viability. Another measure of corruption is the establishment’s appeasement and accommodation with extremist anti-American groups on the left as though they have a legitimate role to play in the reform and influence on policy-making, whether in taking down of historic monuments, controlling the nation’s borders, police protocols in law enforcement, fighting wars overseas or restructuring the economy at home.

    Americans sensed the hour was late in November 2016 when they took a chance and voted to elect outsider Donald Trump for President, with all his faults and shortcomings. Cut from different cloth than politicians, Trump was surprisingly transparent, sometimes expressing himself in raw human terms, putting substance ahead of form, connecting with working people across race and ethnicity, and never afraid of speaking directly and repudiating political correctness.

    Even failing to get support to pass but a few of his legislative initiatives, President Trump will have a successful presidency with lasting effect if he continues the pursuit of five imperatives: 1) continues to make as many solid judicial appointments as possible; 2) completes the repudiation of the Orwellian media and the political correctness that envelopes the culture; 3) enforces existing laws that protect first amendment rights of speech and religion; 4) protects the nation’s borders and prescribes sensible limitations on immigration; and 5) selectively prosecutes serious law breakers from the prior administration and others still operating in the national security bureaucracies known as the “deep state.”

    A fitting legacy for the Trump Presidency might well be: The man who came in from the outside and won the presidency against all the odds, and who took on his shoulders the mission to save the American people from their own government and media. Sounds a lot like “making America great again.”

  26. Romalh
    1 septiembre, 2017 en 6:27 AM

    CHINA CREA INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL QUE DIAGNOSTICA MEJOR QUE LOS MÉDICOS HUMANOS

    China ha fabricado un superordenador que emplea la inteligencia artificial y que permite hacer diagnósticos de numerosas enfermedades con alta precisión.

    La nueva computadora analiza los síntomas de un paciente y es capaz de detectar varios tipos de trastornos, desde agotamiento nervioso hasta enfermedades infecciosas.

    Durante las pruebas se reveló que los diagnósticos de la computadora son un 20% más precisos que los de un médico verdadero.
    ====================================

    SE JO…….. LOS MEDICOS, SUS DIAS ESTAN CONTADOS.

  27. Romalh
    1 septiembre, 2017 en 6:21 AM

    Seis grandes bancos mundiales se unen para crear una criptomoneda

    Seis de los mayores bancos del mundo han revelado este jueves una serie de pasos para avanzar un proyecto dirigido a facilitar que los bancos centrales emitan sus propias monedas digitales basadas en la tecnología de cadena de bloques (‘blockchain’), sobre la que se basan criptomonedas como bitcóin, según informa el portal ‘CoinDesk’.

    El proyecto, denominado ‘Utility Settlement Coin’ (USC), fue impulsado hace un año por las entidades financieras UBS, BNY Mellon, Deutsche Bank, Santander y NEX junto a la ‘startup’ Clearmatics. Ahora, Barclays, CIBC, Credit Suisse, HSBC, MUFG y State Street se unen a la iniciativa.

    El objetivo del proyecto es preparar el camino para que los bancos centrales tengan criptodivisas en el futuro, facilitando a las entidades mundiales realizar una amplia variedad de transacciones entre sí mediante la utilización de activos garantizados en una cadena de bloques personalizada.

    El dinero digital será clave en el futuro de los mercados financieros y los principales bancos del mundo no quieren quedarse atrás. De hecho, los responsables del proyecto llevan ya un tiempo en contacto con los bancos centrales y los reguladores para garantizar que USC cumpla todos los requisitos, como las políticas de protección de datos o la seguridad cibernética.

    Aunque la nueva criptodivisa tendrá un alcance limitado para comenzar, el responsable de inversión estratégica e innovación fintech de UBS, Hyder Jaffrey, ha explicado al citado portal el potencial impacto que el proyecto podría tener algún día: “Lo vemos como un trampolín para que en un futuro los bancos centrales emitan su propia criptomoneda”.
    =========================

    Como vemos YA LE CAYO COMEJEN AL PIANO.

    Venimos diciendolo desde hace un tiempo, sea cual sea su origen LAS CRIPTODIVISAS se prestan a la especulacion y la usura, asi pues
    POR QUE LA GRAN BANCA SE OPONDRIA?
    Tienen ademas la “ventaja” de ser PURAMENTE ELECTRONICA por lo que electronicamente te la pueden confiscar si te portas mal, y por ultimo (no se esta version de la gran banca) en sus versiones originales parecieran facilitar
    EL LAVADO DE DINERO DE LAS DROGAS.

    QUE MAS PUEDE PEDIR LA GRAN BANCA USURERA MUNDIALISTA?

  28. Romalh
    1 septiembre, 2017 en 6:12 AM

    A-L-E-R-T: Rothschild Pulls ALOT Of Money Out Of U.S.—
    Ominous Things Are Coming…

  29. Romalh
    1 septiembre, 2017 en 6:10 AM

    Western Civilization’s Last Stand | Alex Jones and Stefan Molyneux

  30. Romalh
    1 septiembre, 2017 en 6:09 AM

    El mito de la enfermedad mental

    Lucas Carena y Pablo J. Davoli, conductores del programa, plantean el problema de la salud mental, la proliferación de los psicofármacos en el contexto de los intereses corporativos y reflexionan sobre el incremento de las “patologías” mentales.

  31. el bobo de la yuca
    31 agosto, 2017 en 2:48 PM

    El FACTOR OLVIDADO: JAPON …. ya entro en la ecuacion, y dice que cambiara la Constitucion para poder fabricar cohetes y armas nucleares. Y asi mismitico pensara Surcorea sin dudas.
    Y si la muerta de hambre y atrasada Norcorea tuvo esas armas , a Japon y Surcorea les sobra tecnologia y plata para lograrlo en muy poco tiempo

    Que argumentos legales o morales hay para impedirle a esos paises defenderse?
    Si no se pudo impedir a Norcorea las armas nucleares como se podra impedir a Japon eso?

    Rusia y China ya estaran reconsiderando su posicion sobre Norcorea, pues Japon siempre les dio pata por el culo… y puede volver a darselas….

  32. Romalh
    31 agosto, 2017 en 10:49 AM




  33. Romalh
    31 agosto, 2017 en 10:42 AM

    STEFAN MOLYNEUX: ALEX JONES SHOW 8/30/17 (pt-2) INFOWARS



  34. 31 agosto, 2017 en 9:37 AM

  35. 31 agosto, 2017 en 6:50 AM

  36. Romalh
    30 agosto, 2017 en 6:23 PM

    Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
    200 Years Together
    Russo-Jewish History

    https://www.alor.org/Library/Solzhenitsyn%20I%20-%20200%20Years%20Together_Composite_06042017.pdf

  37. Romalh
    30 agosto, 2017 en 4:21 PM

  38. Romalh
    30 agosto, 2017 en 8:54 AM

    La Infantilización de la sociedad – Minidocumental

    La crisis del feminismo – Minidocumental

    El miedo a madurar – Podcast

    La estupidez y las Redes sociales – Podcast

  39. Romalh
    30 agosto, 2017 en 7:51 AM

    El Plan de la Desintegración familiar

    La invasión de los idiotas FHD

    La Infantilizacion de la sociedad

  40. Romalh
    30 agosto, 2017 en 7:31 AM

    August 30, 2017
    Fox News and the ‘Both Sides’ Issue
    By Jon N. Hall

    For at least the last nine years, Sean Hannity of the Fox News Channel has been telling us that “journalism in America is dead.” During Obama’s first campaign, Sean was a lone voice warning anyone who would listen about what Obama actually was: a radical leftwing ideologue. But folks didn’t listen, and so we got eight wasted years and a deeply divided America.

    On August 18, the Washington Post ran “To curtail hate, James Murdoch must clean house at Fox News” by Jennifer Rubin. She accused James Murdoch, son of Rupert and CEO of 21st Century Fox (which owns Fox News) of hypocrisy, and added: “Murdoch seems blissfully unaware of — or in denial about — his family’s role in creating the Trump phenomenon, fueling the rise of a xenophobic, racist demagogue and continuing to fan the flames of his noxious populism, which has brought us to where we are.”

    If Ms. Rubin has a vendetta against Fox it may be because she’s acquitted herself poorly there. Here is a video of Bill O’Reilly taking her to the woodshed for being utterly unprepared to appear on “The Factor.” A few weeks later, Tucker Carlson had Rubin on his Fox show (video) where she was again silly and unprofessional. Perhaps it’s the Post that needs to clean house.

    Ms. Rubin is a blogger. Her blog at the Post is “Right Turn” and her bio-line says it offers “reported opinion from a conservative perspective.” It’s difficult to see what’s conservative about her perspective. She appears quite comfortable throwing around the Left’s usual cheap charges of hate, racism, xenophobia, and immorality. Rubin does not have the demeanor of a serious analyst. Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, the owner of the Post, might want to consider keeping her off TV. Or maybe he could find a blogger who’s an actual conservative. One only has to look at Rubin’s blog headlines to suspect that she’s a rabid anti-Trumper.

    It’s doubtful that there is any other news story where the anti-Trump media has been as nakedly obvious as in the ruckus over President Trump’s remarks about the August 12 incident in Charlottesville. The anti-Trumpers criticize the president for speaking of “both sides”; of supposedly making an equivalency of the neo-Nazi, KKK, white-supremacist side of the skirmish and the alt-left, Antifa side. But if one wants an evenhanded report of what Trump actually said in the aftermath of Charlottesville, then one must tune in to Fox News.

    In “Are President Trump’s new Charlottesville remarks enough?” (9 min. video) on the August 14 edition of Fox’s “Special Report,” Mollie Hemingway sat on a panel with three men and pushed back against the narrative:

    It’s like we’re living in an alternate reality here. People are […] not listening to what Donald Trump actually said on Saturday and they’re not reading the actual full comments that he gave, where he was explicitly denouncing bigotry and violence, where he called on people to come together.

    And the fact is there actually is a violence problem on both the left and the right. In recent years Americans have seen violent protests everywhere from Portland, Berkeley, Ferguson, Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, Brooklyn, Baltimore. All throughout the country people have experienced these violent protests.

    There was an assassination attempt against Republicans by a totally mainstream, progressive, leftist activist. And there is a problem on all sides and people need to come together to denounce all of those things and not tar the entire Democratic Party as being part of the leftist violence and not tar the entire Republican Party as part of the rightist violence.

    Ms. Hemingway demonstrated that she was one journalist who wasn’t buying the media’s received wisdom, and she won that debate handily. And then the next night on “Special Report” (7 min. video), Laura Ingraham sparred with Charles Krauthammer on the “both sides” issue and how the MSM has got it all wrong, and again, the lady came out on top. Krauthammer is usually a very solid analyst, but when he spoke of “what’s in his heart,” he stepped in it. Miss Laura immediately shot back: “You can read a heart, wow, you really are a PhD.”

    The anti-Trump media wants to be taken seriously as analysts but without doing much analysis, (except for psychoanalysis). We’re expected to accept whatever these people say as the assessments of sophisticated, highly moral, and wise people, not the partisan rants of those who want to bring down a president or at least slow down his agenda.

    The “method” of the anti-Trump media is to report their assessments without showing the steps that got them there. They trot out their final judgments but not the supporting detail. If they did report more of the facts, they’d have to defend their conclusions. So in the anti-Trump media we’re treated to judgments without much in the way of argument.

    The president was right to refer to “both sides.” The alt-right had a permit to demonstrate, the alt-left did not have a permit. The alt-left could have stayed away from the demonstration, but instead chose to attend and mix it up with the alt-right. The mayor of Charlottesville could have deployed police to keep the two groups apart, but that doesn’t seem to have been a priority for him.

    The anti-Trump media don’t seem to know how to think about these events. So here’s a question for them: What if the car incident with its death and injuries hadn’t happened, what kind of story would the press be reporting then? If they were honest, they’d write of two radical extremist groups who got into a rumble. And they’d have to lay most of the blame on the alt-left side, as they had no permit to be there. If the alt-left had stayed away, we’d have had a non-story story.

    If the anti-Trump media weren’t so busy trying to ruin Trump, they might report that “both sides” in Charlottesville, the neo-Nazis and the Antifa, are rather similar. They might even ask whether Antifa is fascist, as it certainly uses the violent street tactics of Blackshirts and Brownshirts. That “both sides” could be fascist would be too much for the MSM to wrap its head around. That “both sides” are more alike than they’d like to admit is inconvenient for the narrative. If one side is worse than the other, so what; both groups are repellent, un-American bands of outlaws, and are national embarrassments, especially in the pathetic way they fight.

    After faring so poorly on “The Factor,” Rubin must have rejoiced when O’Reilly left Fox News. But FNC had already been “cleaning house,” dropping Greta van Susteren, Megyn Kelly, and suspending Charles Payne and Eric Bolling. (By the way, the new shows with Tucker Carlson and Martha MacCallum are terrific.)

    Changing the “thrust” of Fox News would be a monumentally bad business decision for James Murdoch. CNN, MSNBC, the BBC, and the networks have a monolithic sameness that is all lockstep left. Fox is the alternative, and about the only one, which is why FNC’s been #1 for so long. Without Fox News, America would be much farther down the road to fascism. The establishment media needs to emulate Fox News and start reporting “both sides.”

  41. Romalh
    30 agosto, 2017 en 7:28 AM

  42. Romalh
    30 agosto, 2017 en 7:26 AM

    Katy Perry Goes Full Libtard at MTV VMAs

  43. Romalh
    30 agosto, 2017 en 7:22 AM

    Sheriff Joe Pardoned, Gives Exclusive Interview To Alex Jones – 08/29/2017

    The Rush Limbaugh Show Podcast August 29, 2017

    DNC Fraud Lawsuit: Shocking Conclusion and Fallout

    The Savage Nation August 29,2017 Podcast –
    Michael Savage Nation 8/29/17 Full Show

  44. Romalh
    30 agosto, 2017 en 7:14 AM

    Los parrafos que he estado poniendo sistematicamente en mis comentarios han sido extraidos del libro de

    Alfredo Jalife

    Hacia la desglolialisación
    que se terminó de imprimir en agosto de 2007
    en los talleres de Corporación Industrial Gráfica, S.A. de C.V
    Francisco Landino 44, Col. Miguel Hidalgo, Tláhuac, México, D.F.
    Composición tipográfica: Literal, S. de R.L. MI.

  45. Romalh
    30 agosto, 2017 en 6:46 AM

    Bueno, aqui les traigo un ejemplo de ‘CONVOCATORIA” de MILENIALS de futuras generaciones A UN ACTO POLITICO.

    SE DIFERENCIAN EN ALGO DE LOS QUE RAUL TRAJO ABAJO?

  46. Romalh
    30 agosto, 2017 en 6:04 AM

    Raul, has traido un vivo ejemplo de MANADA HUMANA ROBOTIZADA, cosa que en cierta forma siempre ha sido asi, pero que las modernas tecnicas de propaganda han exacerbado hasta extremos nunca antes visto. Se nota en este grupo la mas absoluta ausencia de discernimiento FUERA DE LO YA PRECONCEBIDO, lo nuevo, el debate, LA VERDAD EVIDENTE, se vuelve literalmente IRRELEVANTE para estas mentes PRECAPTURADAS por alguna “ideologia”

    POR QUE?

    Aqui entra en juego nuestra naturaleza humana, la verdadera forma en que aprendemos y ENTENDEMOS el mundo que nos rodea

    AQUI MI PUNTO DE VISTA SOBRE EL FENOMENO:


    Asi pues, los que saben y PARA SU BENEFICIO NOS CONVIRTIERON EN MASA de una forma u otra utilizaron desde hace mucho sus conocimientos sobre nuestra mente para dominarnos.
    No es casual que se apropiaran
    – DEL SISTEMA EDUCACIONAL
    – LOS MEDIOS MASIVOS
    – LA CULTURA
    – EL CINE
    Y cuanto medio sirva para INDUCIRNOS IDEAS A SU CONVENIENCIA
    para colonizarnos desde dentro, desde nuestras propias CONVICCIONES Y VALORES que realmente no son otra cosa que IMPLANTES QUE NOS HAN SIDO REALIZADOS sin que nos demos cuenta.

  47. raulizquierdo2009
    30 agosto, 2017 en 12:33 AM

    No se si se ha llegado a un punto de no retorno, lo que si veo es que este pais tiene un problema muy muy muy grave con estos estupidos ideologicos. Esta la gente comportandose como enfermos grave

  48. Romalh
    29 agosto, 2017 en 5:36 PM

    ………..antes de fallecer se había pronunciado inequívocamente
    contra el nuevo totalitarismo multimediático como uno de los
    peores totalitarismos, quizá el peor de todos los conocidos.
    No es acaso el totalitarismo multimediático el peor engendro
    de la globalización financiera? Mediante sus megafusiones en
    diez grandes “cadenas” (en el doble sentido, mediático y esclavizante)
    y cuatro empresas publicitarias “globales” en manos
    globalistas (que hemos denominado la telenpacia), la plutocracia
    oligopólica acapara y ultra-concentra (para no decir intoxica
    e indoctrina) la distribución, la desinformación y la censura
    selectiva de noticias donde la verdad perdió su sentido ontológico
    y teleológico……………..

  49. Romalh
    29 agosto, 2017 en 5:15 PM

    ………..La simple desregulación en el seno del “libre mercado”
    apunta a la dirección de “economías mixtas”, que tampoco son
    ninguna novedad, que de cierta manera vivió el mundo occidental
    antes de la imposición de la desregulación en el mundo de
    la aviación de EU, porque alguien tiene que ejercer el nuevo trámite
    de ordenación de las cosas: el Estado, que ha quedado muy
    lastimado después del brutal ataque y desmantelamiento de las
    trasnacionales que buscaron suplantarlo, o los ciudadanos, quienes
    han despertado en forma increíble y cuya rebelión frenó a la
    perniciosa globalización.
    Qué hubiera sido del género humano sin el resplandeciente despertar ciudadano tanto contra los excesos de la globalización como en contra de las guerras preventivas unilaterales de Baby Bush?………….

  50. Romalh
    29 agosto, 2017 en 5:08 PM

    ……………Faltó poco para que las trasnacionales globalistas hubiesen
    alcanzado el control de vidas y muertes de los humanos mediante
    la automatización y la robotización, menos costosos en términos
    financieros y económicos para las “leyes” del sacrosanto
    “mercado.
    Los humanos no nos hemos percatado aún, por estar
    todavía adentro del espeso bosque y carecer de la debida perspectiva
    holistica, de que estuvimos a punto de ser los nuevos esclavos
    de robots controlados por la neo feudal y parasitaria plutocracia
    oligopólica, lo que hubiera significado el fin de la verdadera civilización.
    No hay que perder de vista que la parte más “costosa”
    para una trasnacional lo representa el factor humano…………

Comment pages
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Responder

Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de WordPress.com

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de WordPress.com. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Google+ photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google+. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Conectando a %s

A %d blogueros les gusta esto: